Abstract :
The landscape of higher education pedagogies is undergoing a transformative evolution, marked by the convergence of diverse methodologies, technological advancements, and a profound shift towards student-centric learning paradigms. This research embarks on an in-depth exploration of the multifaceted dimensions of contemporary pedagogical approaches within advanced learning environments, elucidating the innovations, challenges, and transformative potential within the educational landscape. The exploration delves into a comprehensive analysis of pedagogical paradigms, encapsulating a spectrum of methodologies ranging from traditional didactic teaching methods to innovative student-centered approaches. The historical underpinnings and philosophical foundations that have shaped contemporary pedagogical methodologies are meticulously dissected, unveiling the transition from conventional teaching methods to a more holistic and flexible educational paradigm. A pivotal emphasis within contemporary pedagogies lies in the shift towards student-centric learning paradigms, empowering students as active participants in their educational journey. The exploration highlights a plethora of innovative methodologies including active learning, experiential learning, flipped classrooms, project-based learning, and the integration of technology, revolutionizing educational delivery and fostering a dynamic learning environment. The integration of technology within educational paradigms has catalyzed a digital transformation, offering enhanced accessibility and personalized learning experiences. The implications of this shift extend beyond educational institutions, significantly impacting faculty training, curriculum design, assessment strategies, and student learning outcomes. Challenges, such as ensuring equitable access to technology and effective assessment methods in non-traditional settings, are juxtaposed with transformative opportunities for innovation and collaboration. The future trajectory of higher education pedagogies hinges on continual adaptation, inclusivity, and innovation, ensuring a dynamic and responsive educational environment for future generations. This research offers a comprehensive overview of contemporary pedagogical approaches in higher education, unraveling the complexities, challenges, and transformative potential within advanced learning environments, paving the way for a more adaptive, inclusive, and innovative educational paradigm.

Keywords :
Contemporary Education, Diversity in Education, Educational Innovation, Experiential Learning, Faculty Development, Higher Education, Inclusive Teaching, Pedagogical Approaches, Student-Centric Learning, Technology Integration.

–

References :

• Achary, R. (2016). Development and implementation of an instructional design based on constructivist approach to teach physics at diploma engineering level. Navrachana University Vadodara.
• Acton, R. E. (2018). Innovative learning spaces in higher education: Perception, pedagogic practice and place. James Cook University.
• Adams Becker, S., & Freeman, A. (2016). Giesinger Hall, C., Cummins, M., & Yuhnke, B.(2016). NMC/CoSN horizon report: 2016 K-, 45-72.
• Adducul, R. B., & Gumabay, M. V. N. (2020). Crowd sourcing technology for classroom learning. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/133942020.
• Ahmad, S., & Nath, A. R. (2017). Higher Education in India: Challenges, Opportunities, Trends and Priorities. University News, 55(37), 37.
• Ahmed, H. O. K. (2016). Flipped learning as a new educational paradigm: An analytical critical study. European Scientific Journal, 12(10).
• Aithal, P., & Aithal, S. (2019). Analysis of higher education in Indian National education policy proposal 2019 and its implementation challenges. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 3(2), 1-35.
• Aithal, P., & Aithal, S. (2020a). Analysis of the Indian National Education Policy 2020 towards achieving its objectives. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 5(2), 19-41.
• Aithal, P., & Aithal, S. (2020b). Implementation strategies of higher education part of national education policy 2020 of India towards achieving its objectives. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 5(2), 283-325.
• Aithal, P., & Kumar, P. (2016). Catering Student Enrollment and Retaining Diversity in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Engineering Research and Modern Education (IJERME), 1, 565-577.
• Alakrash, H., & Razak, N. (2020). Towards the education 4.0, readiness level of EFL students in utilising technology- enhanced classroom. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(10), 161-182.
• Alejandro, P., & David, I. (2018). Educational Research and Innovation Teachers as Designers of Learning Environments The Importance of Innovative Pedagogies: The Importance of Innovative Pedagogies: OECD Publishing.
• Allen, J., McGregor, G., Pendergast, D., & Ronksley-Pavia, M. (2019). Young Adolescent Engagement in Learning: Springer.
• Alshabeb, A. M. (2020). The potential of using mobile social media applications for language learning: A case study in Saudi higher education.
• Althuwaini, M. F. (2018). Investigating the integration of the Sport Education model and the Athletics Challenges approach in the teaching of athletics in one Kuwaiti middle school. University of Southampton.
• Ameta, D., Tiwari, S., & Singh, P. (2020). A preliminary study on case-based learning teaching pedagogy: scope in SE education. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference on Formerly known as India Software Engineering Conference.
• Aneja, A. (2018). Gender and Distance Education: Indian and International Contexts: Taylor & Francis.
• Ansari, M. E. (2016). The Future of United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom Higher Education: A University Social Responsibility Model for International Partnerships. Leeds Beckett University.
• Anwar, S. A., Sohail, M. S., & Al-Marri, M. (2020). Quality assurance dimensions for e-learning institutions in Gulf countries. Quality Assurance in Education, 28(4), 205-217.
• Archer, R. S., Davis, F., Ebanks, S. C., & Gragg, R. D. S. (2019). HBCUs broadening participation in geosciences (a journey through InTeGrate). Interdisciplinary Teaching About Earth and the Environment for a Sustainable Future, 361-378.
• Armstrong, B. (2018). Educational development and technology: Scientific e-Resources.
• Bali, M., Cronin, C., & Jhangiani, R. S. (2020). Framing Open Educational Practices from a Social Justice Perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1).
• Becker, S. A., Freeman, A., Hall, C. G., Cummins, M., & Yuhnke, B. (2016). NMC/CoSN horizon report: 2016 K: The New Media Consortium.
• Bell, D., Wooff, D., & McLain, M. (2019). Re-imagining the Future of Design and Technology Education: Undoing a decade of decline.
• Bell, K. (2018). Game on!: Gamification, gameful design, and the rise of the gamer educator: JHU Press.
• Bennett,  M.  (2019).  Lived  Experiences  of  Secondary  School  Technology  Leaders  With  Flexible  Learning  Environments.  Auckland University of Technology.
• Bilawar, P. B. (2020). Lockdown period and information sources. International Journal of Engineering Research and Management (IJERM), 7(6), 7-16.
• Blundell, C. N. (2017). A case study of teachers transforming pedagogical practices through collaborative inquiry-based professional learning in a ubiquitous technologies environment. Queensland University of Technology.
• Boison, B. T. K. (2020). Stakeholder’s role in promoting inclusion for multicultural learners: towards a model for online education. Memorial University of Newfoundland.
• Boon, Z., & Wong, B. (2019). Character and Citizenship Education. School Leadership and Educational Change in Singapore, 183- 199.
• Bourn, D., Hunt, F., & Bamber, P. (2017). A review of education for sustainable development and global citizenship education in teacher education.
• Bradbury, H., Lewis, R., & Embury, D. C. (2019). Education action research: With and for the next generation. The Wiley handbook of action research in education, 5-28.
• Budnyk, O. (2018). Theoretical principles of using STEAM-technologies in the preparation of the teacher of the New Ukrainian school.
• Cain, T. (2018). A case study on best practices of technology integration within instruction. Northcentral University.
• Chakravarti, S. (2020).  ROLE  OF  TEACHERS  IN  IR  4.0,#  GBL  AND  BEYOND  IN  UAE.  International  Journal  of Management (IJM), 11(9).
• Chalak, R. M. (2018). Information and Communication Technology in Kindergarten.
• Chaudhari, P. (2017). Developing and Implementing Multimedia Learning Package for Enhancing ICT Skills of Student-Teachers at Secondary Level. Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda (India).
• Chiappe, A., & Lee, L. L. (2017). Open Teaching: a New Way on E‑learning? Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(5), pp370‑384- pp370‑384.
• Chiu, T. K., & Chai, C.-s. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568.
• Chmait,  S.  (2018).  Exploring  Tertiary  Teachers’  Pedagogical  Experiences  about  Academic  Diversity.  Western  Sydney  University (Australia).
• Coates, H., Kelly, P., & Naylor, R. (2017). Leading online education for student success.  International Journal of Chinese Education, 6(1), 105-126.
• Conlan, M. G. (2019). Teachers’ Perceptions of Progressive Education and Its Instructional Strategies: Immaculata University.
• Cord, K. E. (2016). Instructional leader influence in 1: 1 technology integration creating student-centered learning. Grand Canyon University.
• Costa, C., Car, V., & Papadimitriou, S. (2017). Good practices and emerging trends in media and information literacy. Public Policies in Media and Information Literacy in Europe: cross-country comparisons. New York, USA: Routledge, 227-268.
• Crammond,  R.  J.,  &  Crammond,  R.  J.  (2020).  Entrepreneurship  Education  Futures  and  Learning  Spaces.  Advancing Entrepreneurship Education in Universities: Concepts and Practices for Teaching and Support, 155-185.
• Crick, T. (2017). Computing education: An overview of research in the field. London: Royal Society.
• Croton, B. (2020). Instructor Beliefs Related to Technology Use After Professional Development. Walden University.
• Cutrara, S. (2020). Transforming the Canadian History Classroom: Imagining a New” we”: UBC Press.
• Dakich, E., Watt, T., & Hooley, N. (2016). Reconciling mixed methods approaches with a community narrative model for educational research involving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 38(4), 360-380.
• Dean, B. A., & Campbell, M. (2020). Reshaping work-integrated learning in a post-COVID-19 world of work. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 21(4), 355-364.
• Dede, C. J., & Richards, J. (2020). The 60-year curriculum: New models for lifelong learning in the digital economy: Routledge.
• Dhukaram, A. V., Sgouropoulou, C., Feldman, G., & Amini, A. (2018). Higher education provision using systems thinking approach–case studies. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(1), 3-25.
• Di  Lauro,  F.  (2017).  Virtually  Sound:  Flipped  Classrooms  and  Other  Learning  Spaces.  In  Blended  Learning:  Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 2237-2265): IGI Global.
• Diacopoulos, M. M. (2018). Understanding technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge in an educational technology course: A case study of social studies preservice teacher’s beliefs and dispositions: Old Dominion University.
• Dwivedi, A., Dwivedi, P., Bobek, S., & Zabukovšek, S. S. (2019). Factors affecting students’ engagement with online content in blended learning. Kybernetes, 48(7), 1500-1515.
• Dwivedi, V. J., & Joshi, Y. C. (2019). Productivity in 21 st century Indian higher education institutions. International Journal of Human Resource Management and Research, 9(4), 61-80.
• Ellison, S., & Allen, B. (2018). Disruptive innovation, labor markets, and Big Valley STEM School: network analysis in STEM education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13, 267-298.
• Ferguson, A. K., & Childs, R. A. (2016). The capacities teachers need to address equity and diversity. Teacher Capacities: Knowledge, Beliefs and Skills, 464.
• Ferreira, D. I. (2019). A qualitative action research study of barriers to information and communication technology integration at an Eastern Japan liberal arts college. Northcentral University.
• Fisher, J. T. (2020). Faculty perceived barriers of online education at a Midwestern University in Ohio: The University of Toledo.
• Franklin, R. (2020). Student Preference and Academic Performance in Technology-enriched E-learning Environments: An Evaluation of the TTeSN Virtual E-school Network.
• Garrick, B., Pendergast, D., & Geelan, D. (2017). Theorising personalised education: Springer.
• Geesa, R. L., Stith, K. M., & Teague, G. M. (2020). Integrative STEM education and leadership for student success. The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Discourse, 1-20.
• Gibson, B. (2020). The Impact Of Professional Development Of Effective Teachers In Low Performing Schools.
• Godwin, M. L., & Meek, J. W. (2016). The scholarly practitioner: Connections of research and practice in the classroom. Teaching Public Administration, 34(1), 54-69.
• Goodwin, A. L., Low, E.-L., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Empowered educators in Singapore: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality: John Wiley & Sons.
• Graham, R. (2016). Techno-resiliency in education: Springer.
• Greenberg, I. (2020). Effective Instructional Design Practices for Online Language Learning: Emerging Trends and Implications. Fielding Graduate University.
• Grevtseva, Y., Willems, J., & Adachi, C. (2017). Social media as a tool for micro learning in the context of higher education. Paper presented at the Proceedings of European Conference on social media.
• Groen, J. (2020). Perceptions of Transformation and Quality in Higher Education: A Case Study of PhD Student Experiences. Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa.
• Hansen, S. E. (2018). Improving educational and financial effectiveness through innovation: A case study of Southern New Hampshire University’s College for America. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 149-158.
• Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. (2017). STEAM Education: Fostering creativity in and beyond secondary schools. Australian art education, 38(1), 54-75.
• Hedrick, K. (2018). Where is Their Artistry? Artistic Disposition and Culturally Responsive Education in the Twenty-first Century Secondary Music Classoom. Colorado State University.
• Heiser, R., & Ralston-Berg, P. (2018). Distance Education Affordances. Handbook of Distance Education.
• Hess, A. N. (2018). Transforming academic library instruction: Shifting teaching practices to reflect changed perspectives: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Hills, R. A. (2018). Using mobile devices to engage students in attaining and self-reporting the new BC core competencies.
• Hoofd, I. (2016). Higher Education and Technological Acceleration: Springer.
• Hovey, C. L. (2017). Faculty adoption of teaching innovations that promote diversity and student retention in undergraduate computing. Northeastern University.
• Hu, S. (2019). Academics’ Adoption of Emerging Mobile Technologies within Higher Education in China. ResearchSpace@ Auckland,
• Ingram, K. L. (2020). The impact of the higher education policy on the development of human-centric innovation ecosystems in Lithuania. Mykolo Romerio universitetas.
• Iqbal Imon, M. (2017). ICT integration in Secondary Education in Bangladesh: A study of Policy and Practice.
• Jámbor, A. (2019). AN INNOVATIVE SOLUTION: SMART EDUCATION: Digital Education of Malaysia and Hungary·. Publicationes Universitatis Miskolciensis. Sectio Juridica et Politica, 37(1), 156-169.
• Jarc, J. T. (2018). Teacher as leader: A Gestalt pedagogical approach to career and technical programs in postsecondary education. Creighton University.
• Jayapragas, P. (2016). Leaders in education program: The Singapore model for developing effective principal-ship capability. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 19(1).
• Jie, N. D. (2016). Towards a framework of education policy analysis. THF Literature Rev, 9781003002666-9781003002668.
• Johnson, L. S. (2018). A case study of career and technical education teacher perceptions of online learning management systems. Northcentral University.
• Joynes, C., Rossignoli, S., & Amonoo-Kuofi, E. F. (2019). 21st Century Skills: evidence of issues in definition, demand and delivery for development contexts.
• Kandakatla, R. R. (2019). Reimagining Course Design Using Technology a Case-Study of How Faculty In India Learn to Integrate Technology Tools into Engineering Courses. Purdue University.
• King, R. M. (2018). The Future of Instruction, Learning and Leadership—Education for Holistic Development, Ethical Leadership and Sustainability. The ECCSSA Journal, 1.
• Klichowski, M. (2017). Learning in CyberParks. A theoretical and empirical study: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
• Krug, J. M. M. (2018). Building Community and Capacity: Institutionalized Faculty Development in Community Colleges: University of California, Los Angeles.
• Kwak, N. (2019). American Higher Education in the Post-World War II Era: Rationalized Universities and Empowered Students: Stanford University.
• Lackéus, M. (2016). Value creation as educational practice–Towards a new educational philosophy grounded in entrepreneurship? : Chalmers Tekniska Hogskola (Sweden).
• Lackéus, M., & Williams Middleton, K. (2018). Assessing experiential entrepreneurship education: Key insights from five methods in use at a venture creation programme. Experiential learning for entrepreneurship: Theoretical and practical perspectives on enterprise education, 19-49.
• Lafuente, M., & Law, N. (2018). Understanding innovative pedagogies.
• Law, W.-W., & Xu, S. (2017). Social change and teaching and learning citizenship education: An empirical study of three schools in Guangzhou, China. Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 12(1), 7-41.
• Lee, C., & Richings, L. (2018). Area 1: An Overview of Evidence for the National Approach to Professional Learning in Education.
• Llewellyn, A. (2019). Innovations in learning and teaching in academic libraries: A literature review. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 25(2-4), 129-149.
• Low, E.-L. (2020). English language teacher education for multilingual singapore: Responding to the fourth industrial revolution. Multilingual Education Yearbook 2020: Teacher Education and Multilingual Contexts, 129-148.
• Lytras, M. D., Visvizi, A., Daniela, L., Sarirete, A., & Ordonez De Pablos, P. (2018). Social networks research for sustainable smart education. Sustainability, 10(9), 2974.
• Manimala, M. J., & Thomas, P. (2017). Entrepreneurship education: innovations and best practices. Entrepreneurship education: Experiments with curriculum, pedagogy and target groups, 3-53.
• Marassa, M. (2017). Policy Advocacy: Adoption the 4 C’s Rubrics into Illinois Vision 20/20.
• Martin, K. J. (2018). Educational Development Needs of Higher Education Faculty Working With ELLs. Walden University.
• Mathews, K. M. (2016). Transformative models in K-12 education: The impact of a blended universal design for learning intervention. An experimental mixed methods study. University of San Diego.
• Mayan, O. H. (2019). Understanding Students’ Experiences with E-Learning 2.0 in Australian Higher Education: A Grounded Theory Study. Online Submission.
• Mcdonald, S., Gertsen, F., Rosenstand, C. A. F., & Tollestrup, C. (2018). Promoting interdisciplinarity through an intensive entrepreneurship education post-graduate workshop. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 8(1), 41-55.
• Mitchell, M. (2018). Instructional Leadership for a 21st Century Learning Initiative: How Principals and Teacher Leaders Facilitate Organizational Learning. George Mason University.
• MITTAL, P. (2020). Creating future ready universities. REIMAGINING INDIAN UNIVERSITIES, 1.
• Mohan, B., & Nair, L. R. (2018). Story tellingan effective pedagogy for multicultural education. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 15(3), 81-90.
• Mohiuddin, K., Islam, M. A., Sharif, M., Nur, S., Talukder, M. S., & Alghobiri, M. A. (2020a). Enumeration of Potential Teaching Methods in Higher Education: A Cross-Disciplinary Study. Education Research International, 2020, 1-17.
• Mohiuddin, K., Islam, M. A., Sharif, M., Nur, S., Talukder, M. S., & Alghobiri, M. A. (2020b). Research Article Enumeration of Potential Teaching Methods in Higher Education: A Cross-Disciplinary Study.
• Molnar, K. K. (2017). What effect does flipping the classroom have on undergraduate student perceptions and grades? Education and Information Technologies, 22, 2741-2765.
• Montebello, M. (2019). The ambient intelligent classroom: Beyond the indispensable educator (Vol. 840): Springer.
• Muntean, C. H., Bogusevschi, D., & Muntean, G.-M. (2019). Innovative technology-based solutions for primary, secondary and tertiary STEM education: Paragon Publishing.
• Murphy, C. (2016). Making the shift: Perceptions and challenges of modern learning practice. University of Waikato.
• Murray, A., Crammond, R., Omeihe, K., & Scuotto, V. (2018). Establishing Methods of Entrepreneurship Education in Nurturing New Entrepreneurs: Exploring entrepreneurial practices. Journal of Higher Education Service Science and Management.
• Murray, A., Crammond, R. J., Omeihe, K. O., & Scuotto, V. (2018). Establishing successful methods of entrepreneurship education in nurturing new entrepreneurs: Exploring entrepreneurial practice. Journal of Higher Education Service Science and Management, 1(1).
• Narain, U. (2018). Academic Leadership in India: The Case of Liberal Arts Education. The Business & Management Review, 10(1), 5-13.
• National Academies of Sciences, E., & Medicine. (2018). Graduate STEM education for the 21st century: National Academies Press.
• Naufel, M. (2020). Design & Analysis of a 21st Century, Scalable, Student-Centric Model of Innovation at the Collegiate Level. Arizona State University.
• Navani, M. T. (2020). Transition to HE and equitable learning outcomes: challenges for Indian higher education. Higher Education for the Future, 7(2), 118-131.
• Netanda, R. S., Mamabolo, J., & Themane, M. (2019). Do or die: student support interventions for the survival of distance education institutions in a competitive higher education system. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 397-414.
• New, D. (2018). Student experiences with high school redesign: Investigating the perspectives of diverse students in a personalized learning environment: University of Lethbridge (Canada).
• Nguyen, H. D., Mai, L. T., & Anh Do, D. (2020). Innovations in creative education for tertiary sector in Australia: Present and future challenges. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(11), 1149-1161.
• Oktadiana, H. (2016). A curriculum framework for hospitality and tourism higher education in Indonesia: an exploratory study.
• Omeihe, K., Murray, A., Crammond, R., & Scuotto, V. (2018). Establishing successful  methods  of  entrepreneurship education in nurturing new entrepreneurs: Exploring entrepreneurial practice. Journal of Higher Education Service Science and Management.
• Onyegwara, P. (2020). Middle School Teachers’ Experiences Implementing the Workshop Model in Their Classroom. Walden University.
• Ostini, J., & van der Laan, L. (2016). Enabling innovative postgraduate research: critical foresight and strategic considerations for university leaders. 2016 Queensland University Educators Showcase (QUES 2016).
• Ozkan, D. S., McNair, L. D., & Bairaktarova, D. (2019). Teacher learner, learner teacher: parallels and dissonance in an interdisciplinary design education minor. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(3), 226-235.
• Pack, S. M., & Peek, S. C. (2020). Engaging Students as Stakeholders through a Student Advisory Board. J. Phys. Educ, 7, 74- 81.
• Padley, A. (2017). Designing a student-centered learning experience: The Digital Wellbeing Sprint.
• Page, I. (2020). COVID-19 and higher education: some issues. University News, 58, 23.
• Parrish, J., Parks, R., & Taylor, A. (2017). Building bridges with student mentoring: A design thinking approach. College and University, 92(1), 31.
• Paterson, T., & Prideaux, M. (2020). Exploring collaboration in online group based assessment contexts: Undergraduate Business Program. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(3), 3.
• Penta,  J.  M.  (2019).  Designing  Student-Centric  Solutions  through  Collaboration:  Exploring  the  Experiences  of  Higher  Education Administrators Leading Cross-Functional Projects and Initiatives. Northeastern University.
• Perig, A. V. (2018). Didactic student-friendly approaches to more effective teaching of the fundamentals of scientific research in a digital era of scientometrics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1632.
• Peterson, A., Dumont, H., Lafuente, M., & Law, N. (2018). Understanding innovative pedagogies: Key themes to analyse new approaches to teaching and learning.
• Pfaffe, L. D. (2017). Using the SAMR model as a framework for evaluating mLearning activities and supporting a transformation of learning: St. John’s University (New York).
• PLAN, S. (2020). Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.
• Pors, S. (2016). Introducing and Implementing an Online Learning Environment in a Cambodian Academic Program: Impacts, Enabline Factors and Constraints. University of Melbourne, Melbourne Graduate School of Education.
• Rajeswaran, M. C. (2019). Dialogic Paradigm in Teaching and Assessing English for Specific Purposes (ESP) in Higher Education. IUP Journal of English Studies, 14(4), 83-97.
• Reigeluth, C. M., Beatty, B. J., & Myers, R. D. (2016). Instructional-design theories and models, Volume IV: The learner-centered paradigm of education: Routledge.
• Reimers, F. M., & Chung, C. K. (2019). Teaching and learning for the twenty-first century: Educational goals, policies, and curricula from six nations: Harvard Education Press.
• Robles, L. (2016). A case study of technology-embedded instruction: A student-centered approach to enhance teaching and learning in a K-12 school. University of Southern California.
• Rodriguez, S., & Lieber, H. (2020). Relationship between entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial mindset, and career readiness in secondary students. Journal of Experiential Education, 43(3), 277-298.
• Rose, M. A., Geesa, R. L., & Stith, K. (2019). STEM Leader Excellence: A Modified Delphi Study of Critical Skills, Competencies, and Qualities. Journal of Technology Education, 31(1), 42-62.
• Ross, S. M. (2019). Slack it to me: Complementing LMS with student-centric communications for the millennial/post- millennial student. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(2), 91-108.
• Roth, M. S. (2020). Redesigning liberal education: Innovative design for a twenty-first-century undergraduate education: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Salem, A. (2020).  Learning for uncertainty: higher  education and  sustainability. In  Introduction to  Sustainable Development Leadership and Strategies in Higher Education (pp. 101-114): Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Sant Geronikolou, S. (2020). Exploring current practices and Greek and Spanish academic library stakeholder perceptions towards reconceptualizing in-library use data collection ecosystem.
• Sarangapani, P. M. (2020). A cultural view of teachers, pedagogy, and teacher education. Handbook of education systems in South Asia, 1-24.
• Sator,  A.  (2019).  The  interdependence  of  technology,  pedagogy,  and  epistemology:  A  self-study  of  my  pedagogy  of technology teacher education.
• Schiele, K., Matzen Jr, R. N., & Bridgewater, M. (2017). Using e-portfolios to demonstrate high-impact educational practices and promote student employment success. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 17(1).
• Sequeida, A. S. (2016). A Case Study: Technology, Teaching and Student Learning. University of Southern California.
• Shannon, P. A. (2019). An Investigation into the Interrelationships between Teacher Pedagogy, Flexible Learning Spaces and Student Engagement. La Trobe.
• Sharma, K., Khreisat, L., Cvitan, D., & Singh, G. (2019). Fostering an environment for all students to succeed in computer science: Integrating culturally responsive pedagogies with curricula redesign. In Culturally Responsive Strategies for Reforming STEM Higher Education: Turning the TIDES on Inequity (pp. 97-114): Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Sherwood, R. (2017). Supporting elearners by increasing digital literacy skills in healthcare educators. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 10(1).
• Shih, W.-Y., Pu, Y.-L., & Ho, T.-K. (2019). Construction of a learning scale for postmodern physical education lessons. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation, 41(3), 87-99.
• Shrivastava, A. (2020). Using native advertising approach for knowledge creation in cross cultural studies. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 31(2), 154-179.
• Silva, A., Leite, M., Vilas-Boas, J., & Simões, R. (2019). How education background affects design outcome: teaching product development to mechanical engineers, industrial designers and managers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(4), 545- 569.
• Sinclair, B. R. (2019). Seeing through the eyes of the other: Student-centric unintended consequences of immersion, collision and expansion. Kybernetes, 48(2), 318-332.
• Singh, A. K. (2016). Innovation in Management Education: Status and Strategies. IIMS Journal of Management Science, 7(2), 221- 233.
• Singh, C. B. (2017). Multilevel exclusion of Dalit students in professional elite colleges of India. Social Change, 47(3), 359-372.
• Sivalogathasan, V. (2019). Towards Open Distance Learning for Future: Practices and Challenges in Sri Lanka.
• Smith, G. D., Moir, Z., & Brennan, M. (2017). education (r) evolution. The Routledge research companion to popular music education, 5.
• Snehi, N. (2019). Higher Education in India: Refocusing Faculty Development. The Future of Higher Education in India, 291-306.
• Snehi, N. (2020). Teaching-Learning: A Study of Undergraduate Level of Education. Teaching Learning and New Technologies in Higher Education, 85-99.
• Srinivasa Rao, A., Kumar, P., & Aithal, P. (2015). Strategic planning in higher education institutions: A case study of SIMS- VISION 2025. International Journal of Educational Science and Research (IJESR) ISSN (P), 2249-6947.
• Sullivan, T. N. (2020). Mindful reflection: Does intentional reflection enhance learner creativity and innovation? Northcentral University.
• Sutin, S. E., & Jacob, W. J. (2016). Strategic transformation of higher education: Challenges and solutions in a global economy: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Tan, C. (2018). Comparing high-performing education systems: understanding Singapore, Shanghai, and Hong Kong: Routledge.
• Tan, C. (2020). Confucian philosophy for contemporary education: Routledge.
• Tan, C., & Hairon, S. (2016). Education reform in China: Toward classroom communities. Action in Teacher Education, 38(4), 315-326.
• Tan, H. T., & Heng, A. (2017). The Impact of Quality of Service and Experience on Students Learning Outcomes in Higher Education Institutions. University of Canberra.
• Tan, J. P.-L., Koh, E., Chan, M., Costes-Onishi, P., & Hung, D. (2017). Advancing 21st century competencies in Singapore. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
• Tay, K. S. (2018). Place-Responsive Outdoor Education Pedagogy in Singapore Secondary Schools: A Case Study. University of Otago.
• Templeton, C. E. (2019). An analysis of the pedagogical affordances of a virtual learning environment in a Catholic school. Morehead State University.
• Thompson, J. (2019). Narratives of architectural education: From student to architect: Routledge.
• TOJO, E. B. N., & KISS, B. (2017). Diversity in Education. Lund: Media-Tryck.
• ul Amin, S. N. (2018). ICT integration in education: A smart concept of teaching and learning: Educreation Publishing.
• Venkateswarlu, P. (2017). Establishing a ‘Centre for Engineering Experimentation and Design Simulation’: a step towards restructuring engineering education in India. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(4), 349-367.
• Venkatraman, S., de Souza-Daw, T., & Kaspi, S. (2018). Improving employment outcomes of career and technical education students. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 8(4), 469-483.
• Welch, M. (2017). Reframing experiential education: A broader perspective of community engagement. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 65-86.
• Welch, M. (2019). The craft of community-engaged teaching and learning: A guide for faculty development.
• Westbrooks II, D. A. (2016). Intelligence studies in higher education: Integrating a community of practice pedagogical strategy: Hampton University.
• Whipp, K. (2015). Evaluating the implementation of an e-learning innovation in a South Auckland secondary school.
• Wise, R. (2018). Instructional Differentiation and Accommodations to Support Student Achievement in SLD and ADHD Secondary School Populations: An Evaluation Study. University of Southern California.
• Wolfe, B.  A.,  &  Riggs,  E.  M.  (2017).  Macrosystem  analysis  of  programs and  strategies  to increase  underrepresented populations in the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 577-593.
• Wolstencroft, P., De Main, L., & Cashian, P. (2020). Ebook: Achieving Teaching Excellence: Developing Your TEF Profile and Be yond: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
• Wright, N. (2018). Becoming an Innovative Learning Environment.  The making of a  New  Zeeland secondary school, DOI:   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0764, Springer.
• Wright, O., & Main, K. (2015). Analysing Peer Pedagogic Practices as a Positive Contribution to Academic Professional Development: A Strategic Approach to Improving Faculty Teaching. In Teaching for learning and learning for teaching (pp. 117- 133): Brill.
• Zagerman, J. M. (2018). Using song lyrics in teaching an undergraduate statistics course.
• Zaidi, S. A. N. (2020). The Corporatization of Educational Materials and Its Effects or Influence on the Ways That University Instructors and Professors Teach in an Age of Globalization. University of Windsor (Canada).
• Zhao, Y., Emler, T. E., Snethen, A., & Yin, D. (2019). An education crisis is a terrible thing to waste: How radical changes can spark student excitement and success: Teachers College Press.

–

---

---

WEB – PAGE COUNTER